FY15-Q1 Consultant Evaluation Survey TEST

4 : Drawings were complete and accurate. Consultant showed strong understanding of Starbucks CAP standards.

3 : Drawings were mostly complete and accurate. Consultant showed general understanding of Starbucks CAP standards.

2 : Drawings were somewhat incomplete and/or inaccurate. Unclear whether Consultant understands Starbucks CAP standards.

1 : Drawings were incomplete and inaccurate. Consultant does not understand Starbucks CAP standards.

Additional Comment

4 : Communication was consistently clear, concise and timely.

3 : For the most part, communication was clear and concise, but not timely.

2 : Communication was timely, but was often confusing.

1 : Communication was consistently confusing and required excessive follow-up.

Additional Comments

4 : Consultant communicated in advance, accurate estimate of additional hours based on the scope of work.

3 : Consultant had some difficulty understanding the scope and/or estimating appropriate number of additional hours in advance.

2 : Consultant proposed unreasonable estimate of additional hours required for the project and/or misunderstood the scope.

1 : Consultant did not communicate about additional hours until after completing the work.

N/A

Additional Comments

4 : Consultant executed contract forms accurately and in a timely manner.

3 : Consultant executed contract forms accurately, but not timely.

2 : Project documentation was re-issued several times requiring multiple corrections.

1 : Consultant failed to issue project documentation correctly after several requests.

Additional Comments

4 : Consultant's approach to the project was highly collaborative and feedback was particularly constructive.

3 : Consultant's approach to the project was positive, but not particularly collaborative.

2 : Consultant's approach to the project was not particularly positive or collaborative.

1 : Consultant's approach was negative and there was no attempt to collaborate or provide feedback.

Additional Comments