This free survey is powered by
0%
Exit Survey
 
 
Research-Colleague 1 Tips and Definitions
   
Research-Colleague 2
   
 
 
Think of Research-Colleague 1

Consider the following: Was research colleague 1 satisfied with the University's commercialization practices?

Please indicate changes over time in your perception of research-colleague 1's level-of-satisfaction with the University's commercialization practices, from 2005 through 2010:

Tips and Definitions
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Satisfied
Somewhat Satisfied
Neutral
Somewhat Unsatisfied
Unsatisfied
 
 
Think of Research-Colleague 2

Consider the following: Was research-colleague 2 satisfied with the University's commercialization practices?

Please indicate changes over time in your perception of research-colleague 2's level-of-satisfaction with the University's commercialization practices, from 2005 through 2010:

Tips and Definitions
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Satisfied
Somewhat Satisfied
Neutral
Somewhat Unsatisfied
Unsatisfied
 
 
Think of Research-Colleague 1

Consider the following: Was commercialization a research-priority for research-colleague 1?

Please indicate changes over time in your perception of research-colleague 1's level of commercialization-as-a-research-priority, from 2005 through 2010:


Tips and Definitions
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
High Priority
Somewhat at Priority
Neutral
Low Priority
Not a Priority
 
 
Think of Research-Colleague 2

Consider the following: Was commercialization a research-priority for research-colleague 2?

Please indicate changes over time in your perception of research-colleague 2's level of commercialization-as-a-research-priority, from 2005 through 2010:


Tips and Definitions
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
High Priority
Somewhat a Priority
Neutral
Low Priority
Not a Priority
 
 
Think of Research-Colleague 1

Consider the opinion that research-colleague 1 held towards the University's office of technology transfer.

Please indicate changes over time in your perception of research-colleague 2's opinion towards the University's office of technology transfer, from 2005 through 2010:


Tips and Definitions
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Positive
Somewhat Positive
Neutral
Somewhat Negative
Negative
 
 
Think of Research-Colleague 2

Consider the opinion that research-colleague 2 held towards the University's office of technology transfer.

Please indicate changes over time in your perception of research-colleague 2's opinion towards the University's office of technology transfer, from 2005 through 2010:


Tips and Definitions
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Positive
Somewhat Positive
Neutral
Somewhat Negative
Negative