This free survey is powered by
Create a Survey
Surveys
2015
November
R
Raflatac Tableau Reporting Suit Feedback
Raflatac Tableau Reporting Suit Feedback
0%
Exit Survey
Dear Colleagues, following up on the Tableau Business Intelligence suit developments by KN IL LCC Wroclaw R&PM team, we would like to collect your opinion and feedback, on the first reports and prototypes shared with you. It will help to streamline next steps and further developments.
For you information and convenience, current reporting prototypes are based on the Tableau Reader funcionality. Upgraded alternative for future consideration is Tableau Server version. the difference beteen both, as explained benath:
Tableau Reader
No access rights - just work with the file. If the users have an unlimited access to data, no problem. If the access rights should be limited - You have to create as many data extracts/ reports, as the number of users
No automatically data refresh. The Tableau Desktop user has to refresh the data, save the file and send it to the end users via e-mail or shared folder.
No "view data" option - drill through functionality is unavailable for the Tableau Reader users.
The users work with the file - no control over the file, possible some technical problems with sending the file (if it's like 30 MB "heavy"…)
No control over the end user's activity.
Tableau Server
Full users access rights control on many levels - the users may get (or not) the rights to view data, filter, drill through, comments, share the analyses, modify their definitions etc. The administrator may define the scope of the data allowed for particular users. Integration with Active Directory.
Automatically data refresh based on defined schedulers - even every 5 minutes.
"View data" - drill through option available for the end users.
The users work with the website via browser or mobile device. No problem with "heavy" files.
Full administrative control over the users activities - monitoring of the loggings, analyses used by particular users etc.
Please take a few minutes to fill in the survey.
How long have you used Tableau based KN IL reports ?
1- 6 months
Less then 1 month
Not sure
Never used
How often do you use KN IL Tableau KN IL reports ?
Daily
Once a week
2 to 3 times a month
Once a month
Never
Overall, how satisfied are you, with KN IL Tableau KN IL reports ?
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisifed
Very Dissatisfied
Not sure
Do you see Tableau, as a permanent replacement of current excell based reporting suit, in the future ?
Definitely
Probably
Not sure
Probably not
Definitely not
Do not know
Which Business Intelligence platform you prefer ?
Tableau
Qlick
Other
No preference
Do not know
Please allocate 100 points on most relevant "values/benefits" coming out enabling KN IL 4PL transport report and analytics interface to Tableau/Qlik/Other BI platform
Resource efficiency upgrade - enabling you shift from excel data crunching into data based strategic thinking
Low running costs - free Tableau reader access, reasonable server licence costs
Business control upgrade (customer sees on line, live picture of its supply chain from all angles: time, costs, efficiency, flexibility; Many mathematical functions build in – like trend lines, forecasts enabling “what if” instant analysis etc., )
No need for excel proficiency / just analyse data
Access via mobiles, tablets, iPhones, iPads
Dashboard visual quality ( standardized top aesthetics look, data on maps, geocoding, visualization: bullet graphs, sectioned tree maps etc.)
Access 24/7 ( no excel attachment push thought email, share storing points ) - in case of server licence
Live data ( data feed refresh can be enabled “on line”, cutting weekly/monthly update routine, live time performance monitors possible) - in case of server licence
Easy integration with many data sources – like ORACLE, DB2, MS SQL, SAP HANA, Google Analytics, Hadoop etc. Using data from many data sources in one analyse – like “plan/ actuals” comparison from EXCEL (budget) and the ERP database (actuals)
Industry/core customer organization pioneering ( looks like Tableau/Qlick do not have a single reference case out of true 4PL transport management application )
Self-service/progressive creation ( drill-down and drill-through analyses available for the business users, responsive design - customer can self-customized the content and deep dive into what is interested ) - in case of server licence
Full history ( no data time horizon limits )
Dynamics, instant data look change, when requested ( data look, instantly changed, within data feeder content )
0
Comments/Suggestions:
How satisfied are you:
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
with the quality of the overall event?
with the scope of information presented?
with the usefulness of the information?
with the quality of the presentations in the general sessions?
with the overall meeting format's emphasis on training?
that you had sufficient time to network and share ideas with your peers?
with the amount of time dedicated to training?
with the meetings' overall value in helping you improve your professional effectiveness?
that the meeting was a motivational experience for you?
that you and your peers received appropriate recognition and appreciation at the meeting for your contributions last year?
Loading...
close
Loading...
Close
staticapp1.questionpro.net