| |
FABER GROUP BERHAD (“FGB”)
- ANNUAL BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ (“BOARD”) EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT (“BEA”)
Dear YBhg. Dato'/Datuk/Dr./Sir/Madam,
Pursuant to the launch of the Green Book : Enhancing Board Effectiveness by the Putrajaya Committee on GLC High Performance on 26 April 2006, the Legal & Secretarial Department of FGB had, in years 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2012 undertaken the BEA exercise in-house.
In 2011, PricewaterhouseCoopers Advisory Services Sdn Bhd was appointed for the provision of independent annual BEA services pursuant to the request of the FGB Board at the 2/2011 Board Meeting held on 24 February 2011. The Board had requested for the BEA for 2011 to be conducted independently and as such, there was a need for an independent consultant company to be selected and appointed.
Premised on the foregoing and in relation to the BEA exercise for 2013 will be assess online, YBhg. Dato'/Datuk/Dr./your are required to complete the online assessment as follows:-
(i) Board of Directors Evaluation Form (“Part A”)
(ii) Directors’ Evaluation (Self/Peer) From (“Part B”); and
(iii) Board Committee Evaluation Form (“Part C”), only circulated to members of the respective Board Committees.
To assist/guide Datuk/Dato’/you in completing Part B, we had enclosed the following for reference when filling up the BEA assessment online:-
(i) The Directors’ attendance at Board Meetings (relevant to question no. 4.4) ;
(ii) The list of trainings attended by the Directors for the period from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2013 (relevant to questions no. 5.2 and 5.3); and
(iii) On question no. 2.2, we wish to inform that to the best of our knowledge, none of the Directors’ of FBG has any previous/on going litigations or criminal convictions.
We would be obliged if the all parts of the online assessment could be completed to facilitate the analysis of the feedback received.
Upon completion of the analysis, a report on the detailed feedback will be presented firstly to the Nomination and Remuneration Committee and thereafter the Board of FGB.
Thank you very much for your time and support. Please start with the survey now by clicking on the Continue button below. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1.0 BOARD COMPOSITION
1.1 Size and structure appropriate for decision making considering the scope and nature of FGB’s operations |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1.2 Core skills, competencies and experience in functional and operational areas are adequately represented by Board members |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1.3 Spend sufficient time learning the Company’s business and understand well enough to provide oversight |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1.4 The ratio of Executives to Non-Executives is appropriate |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1.5 The role of the Senior Independent Non-Executive Director to whom concerns may be conveyed is effective |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1.6 Non-Executive Directors are effective in probing and testing information provided to them |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1.7 Committees have been assigned appropriate tasks and the division of duties between the Committees and the full Board is correct |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1.8 The Chairman demonstrates and commands effective leadership of the Board |
| |
|
|
|
|
Loading...
