|
|
|
|
| Years working as Parole Officer | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What type of training have had you in the past two years? (check all that apply) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
* Have you taken the desistance e-course? |
| |
|
|
|
|
1. Programming should target the dynamic factors related to criminal behavior. |
| |
|
|
|
|
2. Why is Risk/Need Assessment information useful in Problem Solving? |
| |
|
|
|
|
3. Problem Solving is a process in which parole officers help offenders identify the thoughts and actions that occur prior to, during, and after an offender engages in criminal activity. |
| |
|
|
|
|
4. Risk and needs assessment information results should not be shared with a parolee. |
| |
|
|
|
|
5. A high risk offender should never be thought of as a desister. |
| |
|
|
|
|
1. How can a parole officer help an offender visualize the benefits of being an ex-offender? |
| |
|
|
|
|
2. When attempting to introduce new stabilizers into an offender’s life, it is most helpful to set out a plan for what stabilizers should be built on over the next year. |
| |
|
|
|
|
3. The movement from offender to a non-offender identity is an example of Primary Desistance. |
| |
|
|
|
|
4. Which of the following is NOT a valid strategy for helping offenders Desist? |
| |
|
|
|
|
5. Which of the following statements about Desistance is true? |
| |
|
|
|
|
1. Which of the following is NOT related to Motivation to Change? |
| |
|
|
|
|
2. Trust between the offender and the criminal justice staff is an important factor in ensuring that problem solving can occur. |
| |
|
|
|
|
3. Which of the following is part of the OARS acronym? |
| |
|
|
|
|
4. Which of the following is an example of Change Talk? |
| |
|
|
|
|
5. Positive relationships, including relationships with a Parole Officer is an example of an external motivator for change. |
| |
|
|
|
|
1. Once a Case Plan is developed it must always be followed as written. |
| |
|
|
|
|
2. Steps to enhance case planning include: working with an offender to develop incentives, identifying long term goals, and reviewing incentives and sanctions with the offender |
| |
|
|
|
|
3. Which of the following indicates cooperation between POs and offenders? |
| |
|
|
|
|
4. Delivery of positive reinforcement for engaging in good behavior should NOT be: |
| |
|
|
|
|
5. When POs are either overly authoritative or unduly indirect, individuals are less likely to engage in criminal activity. |
| |
|
|
|
For the next set of questions please refer to the below case study.
Case Study 1: Tim Jones
Tim Jones is a 27 year-old offender who is currently on parole for grand theft auto and vandalism. Tim has two friends by the name of Frank and Terrence whom he grew up with. When Tim gets into trouble, he is always with Terrence and Frank, who were also convicted with auto theft and vandalism. Terrence and Frank have been involved in the criminal justice system since they were teenagers. While Tim does not have a long criminal history, this is his second time on parole and fifth overall time having contact with the criminal justice system. As a child, Tim was always a follower and hung out with the more popular kids. In middle school, Tim spent a lot time in ISS (in-school suspension). Tim spent this time in ISS because of his anger and destruction of other people’s property.
Tim’s mother and father have been married for 30 years and have been supportive of him. He has four other siblings, none of whom are in the criminal justice system. Tim is the oldest child and has always looked out for his younger siblings and encouraged them to do well. After graduating from high school, Tim married his childhood sweetheart. She is very supportive of Tim and has been encouraging him to consider exploring IT classes since Tim has an interest in computers. Tim missed his office visit with PO Williams two weeks ago.
PO Williams encounters Tim in the grocery store where Tim tells him the following story: Tim states that he has been working at his old job for the past three months, (he had been working there for two years prior to being detained after the arrest). He gets along with most of his co-workers though he doesn’t care for everybody, but there is one co-worker that calls Tim “boy’ and gives him jobs that are not part of his job description. Tim tells PO Williams that he knows where this coworker lives and he wants to go and settle the problem once and for all. PO Williams looks around and sees that Frank and Terrence are in the store with Tim.
|
|
1. Tim’s criminogenic needs include: |
| |
|
|
|
|
2. Which of the following factors might be considered Stabilizers in Tim’s life? |
| |
|
|
|
|
3. Which of the following appears to be a constant problem in Tim’s life? |
| |
|
|
|
|
4. Which of the following factors is a Destabilizer that may negatively affect Tim’s ability to follow through on supervision requirements? |
| |
|
|
|
|
5. How can PO Williams use this encounter to further their working relationship? (check all that apply) |
| |
|
|
|
|
For the next set of questions please refer to the below case study.
Case Study 2: John Black
John Black, age 21, is a former gang member with a history of violence and weapon charges. He was assessed as high risk using statistical scales based on an extensive criminal history and risk of violent behavior. He identified his criminogenic needs as substance abuse and associating with criminal peers. Now on parole, he has moved to his aunt’s house in the suburbs, far away from the influence of his former gang. He has started attending a GED program and is also studying to be a chef. His grades have been positive so far, and John has consistently attended his classes.
In initial interviews, John verbally stated an interest in turning his life around, saying he was sick of jail and always looking behind his back. He indicated he had a new (prosocial) girlfriend, had some part-time work, and was avoiding old criminal friends.
In the case plan they developed together John and his PO outlined the consequences for failing drug tests. The first offense would be a warning, the second offense would result in increased testing, and third time John failed a drug test would result in a parole revocation.
John has been on parole for four months. He has had a positive relationship with his PO and checks in on time. Overall, his performance has been fully satisfactory and he has not violated any parole conditions. He disclosed during today’s interview that he went to one of his friends’ birthday party on the weekend and drank two frozen drinks (he stated he later realized they were alcoholic) – a breach (confirmed with a blood test, which also tested positive for THC). He denies having smoked marijuana.
|
|
1. Which of the following factors would be considered Stabilizers in John’s life? (check all that apply) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
2. Which of the following factors is a Destabilizer that may negatively affect John’s ability to follow through on supervision requirements? (check all that apply) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
3. Which of the following would be considered an appropriate and immediate Sanction for testing positive to THC? (check all that apply) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
4. When assessing the positives and negatives of the current situation, the PO should: |
| |
|
|
|
|
5. John appears to have a high level of Engagement. He has a positive relationship with his parole officer and he appears to be genuinely motivated to change. |
| |
|
|
|
The next set of questions pertain to Case Management and Monitoring.
1. To what extent do you use the following case management practices with clients on your caseload?
|
|
|
|
|
2. In monitoring the progress of a client on your caseload who is attending a treatment program or other service, how frequently do you typically engage in each of the following activities?
|
|
|
|
|
3. Please indicate the extent to which you feel comfortable in doing the following.
|
|
|
|
|