This free survey is powered by QUESTIONPRO.COM

EAC Training - Week 1 Evaluation


0%
Exit Survey »
 
 
You are invited to participate in our evaluation of week one of the Exploitation Analysis Center Training. It will take approximately 5-10 minutes to complete the questionnaire. The survey is arranged by module of instruction and includes an option at the end of each module to leave comments.

Your evaluation responses will be strictly confidential and data from this research will be reported only in the aggregate.

Thank you very much for your time and support. Please start with the survey now by clicking on the Continue button below.
 
 
 
The overall explanation of site exploitation within SOCOM and the EAC role within the process was clearly explained at a level I could understand.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Training Modules
Please evaluate each module.

Forensic Awareness Scenario:
This exercise helped me understand my pre-course knowledge of forensics.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Forensic Awareness Scenario:
Instructors effectively facilitated the practical exercise.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Comments on Forensic Awareness Scenario:
   
 
 
 
Toolmarks:
The content presented was sufficient to meet expectations.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Toolmarks:
The materials used in the practical applications for this training were of high quality and reinforced classroom learning.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Toolmarks:
Practical applications conducted during this module contributed to learning new skills and techniques.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Toolmarks:
Instructors presented information in a clear and effective manner.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Toolmarks:
The classroom presentations used to conduct this training were of high quality.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Toolmarks:
Instructors effectively facilitated the practical applications.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Toolmarks:
Skills learned during this training will be used again with confidence.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Comments on Toolmarks:
   
 
 
 
Biologics (DNA):
The content presented was sufficient to meet expectations.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Biologics (DNA):
The classroom presentations used to conduct this training were of high quality.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Biologics (DNA):
The materials used in the practical applications for this training were of high quality and reinforced classroom learning.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Biologics (DNA):
Practical applications conducted during this module contributed to learning new skills and techniques.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Biologics (DNA):
Instructors presented information in a clear and effective manner.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Biologics (DNA):
Instructors effectively facilitated the practical applications.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Biologics (DNA):
Skills learned during this training will be used again with confidence.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Comments on Biologics (DNA):
   
 
 
 
Field Photography (D10):
The content presented was sufficient to meet expectations.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Field Photography (D10):
The classroom presentations used to conduct this training were of high quality.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Field Photography (D10):
The materials used in the practical applications for this training were of high quality and reinforced classroom learning.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Field Photography (D10):
Practical applications conducted during this module contributed to learning new skills and techniques.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Field Photography (D10):
Instructors presented information in a clear and effective manner.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Field Photography (D10):
Instructors effectively facilitated the practical applications.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Field Photography (D10):
Skills learned during this training will be used again with confidence.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Comments on Field Photography (D10):
   
 
 
 
Improvised Explosive Devices:
The content presented was sufficient to meet expectations.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Improvised Explosive Devices:
The classroom presentations used to conduct this training were of high quality.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Improvised Explosive Devices:
The materials used in the practical applications for this training were of high quality and reinforced classroom learning.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Improvised Explosive Devices:
Practical applications conducted during this module contributed to learning new skills and techniques.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Improvised Explosive Devices:
Instructors presented information in a clear and effective manner.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Improvised Explosive Devices:
Instructors effectively facilitated the practical applications.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Improvised Explosive Devices:
Skills learned during this training will be used again with confidence.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Comments on Improvised Explosive Devices:
   
 
 
 
Chemical Analysis:
The content presented was sufficient to meet expectations.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Chemical Analysis:
The classroom presentations used to conduct this training were of high quality.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Chemical Analysis:
The materials used in the practical applications for this training were of high quality and reinforced classroom learning.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Chemical Analysis:
Practical applications conducted during this module contributed to learning new skills and techniques.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Chemical Analysis:
Instructors presented information in a clear and effective manner.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Chemical Analysis:
Instructors effectively facilitated the practical applications.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Chemical Analysis:
Skills learned during this training will be used again with confidence.
 
Strongly Agree
 
Agree
 
Neutral
 
Disagree
 
Strongly Disagree
 
 
 
Comments on Chemical Analysis:
   
 
 
 
Additional comments or suggestions:
   
 
National Forensic Science Technology Center WWW.NFSTC.org
Survey Software Powered by QuestionPro Survey Software