|
Instructions: Please answer the questions by selecting the option on each of the scales at the point which matched your experience. Consider only the most recent scenario when answering. If you have any questions, please ask the experimenter. |
| |
|
|
| * Please enter your identification: | | |
|
|
1. Using the chart below, how would you rate your average level of workload?
(a) Working up from the bottom, answer each yes/no question according to the scenario. (b) Select the numerical rating that best reflects your experience.
|
|
|
|
2. My overall workload was acceptable.
|
|
|
|
|
3. How would you rate the scenario overall traffic load?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Party Call Sign Format Questions |
| |
|
|
4. I was able to sufficiently communicate the third party call sign using the format.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 5. Did use of the third party call sign cause you to make any errors? |
| |
|
|
|
|
* 6. Did you observe any errors made by flight crews related to call signs? |
| |
|
|
|
7. I was able to understand pilot readbacks for third party call sign.
|
|
|
|
|
8. I was able to remember what third party call sign format to use when referencing a third party aircraft.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 9. Did you have any specific issues with the third party call sign format? |
| |
|
|
|
|
* 10. Did you ever experience confusion about who you were talking to vs. who you were talking about? |
| |
|
|
|
|
* 11. Did you ever have a desire to use a third party call sign format different than the one specified? |
| |
|
|
|
|
* 12. Do you think that the use of this third party call sign format will cause errors? |
| |
|
|
|
|
Third Party Call Sign in Context of Broader Communication |
| |
|
|
13. The third party call sign position within the communication was acceptable.
|
|
|
|
|
14. The third party call sign acceptability is affected by its position in the communication.
|
|
|
|
|
15. The third party call sign acceptability was affected by the other elements (e.g., assigned spacing goal or altitude) in the communication.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 16. The length of the communication that included third party call sign affected the acceptability of the third party call sign format. |
| |
|
|
|
17. The length of the communication that included third party call sign was acceptable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 18. The complexity of the communication that included third party call sign affected the acceptability of the third party call sign format? |
| |
|
|
|
19. The complexity of the communication that included third party call sign was acceptable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Party Call Sign Overall Impression |
| |
|
|
20. The third party call sign format would be acceptable in the field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 21. Do you have any concerns about employing the third party call sign format in the field? |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 22. Were there any factors that led to confusion with regards to third party call sign phraseology (e.g., unusual call signs, traffic situations, etc.) ? |
| |
|
|
|
|
* 23. Are there any additional observations (relative to equipment, automation, traffic situations, instructions or performance) that the experimenters need to be aware of? |
| |
|
|
|