This free survey is powered by
  1. Surveys
  2. 2013
  3. March
  4. F
  5. Fremont Survey
0%
Exit Survey
 
 
The FUSD Committee for Leadership Effectiveness developed a prototype of an administrator evaluation tool and process that we have been piloting this school year. The purpose of this survey is to help inform the Committee about what aspects of the tool and process are working and what areas still need improvement.


Instructions: Please refer to the evaluation tool, which includes the rubric(sent in an email from Deanna Wendel), as you fill out the survey. Please complete survey by Friday, May 31st.
 
 
 
What best describes your involvement with the pilot evaluation tool and process?
 
Principal using the pilot tool to evaluate
 
Director using the pilot tool to evaluate
 
Principals/Assistant Principal being evaluated using the pilot tool
 
Other
 
 
 
 
Please indicate which grade level best applies to you?
 
Elementary
 
Middle School
 
High School
 
Other
 
 
 
Overarching Questions Regarding the Pilot Tool and Process- Please rate the new tool and process on the following:
Strongly Agree Agree Agree to some extent Do not agree N/A
The pilot evaluation tool and process is an improvement over the former system.
Overall, I am satisfied with the new evaluation tool and process.
The leading and learning rubric provides an accurate definition of leader effectiveness.
The leading and learning rubric provides a comprehensive definition of leader effectiveness.
There are no domains or individual standards that are missing from the rubric.
The rubric is comprehensive, while also being accessible (i.e. it is not overwhelming).
The pilot evaluation tool and process invites positive conversations about continual improvement.
The pilot evaluation tool effectively supports administrators and leaders in setting goals and priorities for improvement.
The evaluation tool and process makes it possible to distinguish different levels of leader effectiveness.
The evaluation tool appropriately addresses the strong relationship between effective teaching and student learning.
There are multiple measures of leader effectiveness used in the pilot evaluation tool.
The evaluation tool provided me with useful and timely feedback.
There is support (professional development/guidance) to help leaders develop areas of improvement.
The evaluation tool is a good resource for professional growth.
 
 
 
If you have any comments on the above section, please list them here:
   
 
 
 
Please describe your satisfaction level with the categories used in the rubric (e.g. distinguished, proficient, developing and ineffective). Any suggestions for how they might be improved are appreciated.