This free survey is powered by
  1. Surveys
  2. 2013
  3. September
  4. H
  5. Hollister 2013 QE Conference
0%
Exit Survey
 
 
1. Hello:

Thanks for participating in this year's QE Conference. Your responses on this short survey will provide an opportunity for us to continuously improve and help ensure future conferences continue to be relevant and add value to the organization.

Thank you for your time,
George Pasinski
 
 
 
2. What is your home site and on what date(s) did you attend the conference?
Home Site
 
Ballina
 
Bawal
 
Fredensborg
 
Kirksville
 
Libertyville
 
Stuarts Draft
Attendance Date(s)
 
Sept 10
 
Sept 11
 
Sept 12

 
 
3. Using the scale below, please rank the following general statements about the conference. Provide comments, if desired, in the box at the bottom of the page.

5 stars = highly agree
4 stars = somewhat agree
3 stars = neutral
2 stars = somewhat disagree
1 star = highly disagree
The conference agenda met my expectations.
The duration and general cadence of the conference met my expectations.
The pre-conference communications were adequate and timely.
The conference facilities (room, temperature, meals, lighting, power, etc.) met my expectations.
The number and length of breaks was adequate.
The transpotation / lodging arrangements met my expectations.
I had sufficient opportunity to interact / network with other attendees.
As a result of the conference, I better understand my role as a QE within Hollister
As a result of the conference, I have a better understanding of tools needed to be successful as a QE within Hollister
Overall, I think the conference was time well spent.
 
 
 
4. Comments/Suggestions:
   
 
 
5. For each of the agenda topics listed below, please rate the following statement:

"The topic was relevant to my role at Hollister."

If you were not present for a particular topic, please choose "N/A".
Highly Agree Somewhat Agree Neutral Somewhat Disagree Highly Disagree N/A
QII Overview
SPRING / Design Control / Reglera updates
Supplier Quality Update
Guest Speaker - Brian Mongold
State of GQM / Strategic Plan
Fredensborg Lessons Learned From DOW Film
pFMEA / dFMEA - Use of Tools and Standardization
Cross-facility GR&R / Correlation Study
Sampling Plans
ISO 14971 Updates
Quality Control Plan Development
Update From FAT/SAT Team
Spec Development Based on VOP
Fredensborg Process Validation Project
Process Validation Workshop
 
 
6. For each of the agenda topics listed below, please rate the following statement:

"The level of discussion and detail on this topic met my expectations."

If you were not present for a particular topic, please choose "N/A".
Highly Agree Somewhat Agree Neutral Somewhat Disagree Highly Disagree N/A
QII Overview
SPRING / Design Control / Reglera updates
Supplier Quality Update
Guest Speaker - Brian Mongold
State of GQM / Strategic Plan
Fredensborg Lessons Learned From DOW Film
pFMEA / dFMEA - Use of Tools and Standardization
Cross-facility GR&R / Correlation Study
Sampling Plans
ISO 14971 Updates
Quality Control Plan Development
Update From FAT/SAT Team
Spec Development Based on VOP
Fredensborg Process Validation Project
Process Validation Workshop
 
 
7. For each of the agenda topics listed below, please rate the following statement:

"The outcomes resulting from discussions on this topic will add value to my role at Hollister."

If you were not present for a particular topic, please choose "N/A".
Highly Agree Somewhat Agree Neutral Somewhat Disagree Highly Disagree N/A
QII Overview
SPRING / Design Control / Reglera updates
Supplier Quality Update
Guest Speaker - Brian Mongold
State of GQM / Strategic Plan
Fredensborg Lessons Learned From DOW Film
pFMEA / dFMEA - Use of Tools and Standardization
Cross-facility GR&R / Correlation Study
Sampling Plans
ISO 14971 Updates
Quality Control Plan Development
Update From FAT/SAT Team
Spec Development Based on VOP
Fredensborg Process Validation Project
Process Validation Workshop
 
 
 
1.
   
2.
   
3.
   
4.
   
5.
   
 
 
 
1.
   
2.
   
3.
   
4.
   
5.
   
 
 
 
1.
   
2.
   
3.
   
4.
   
5.