LAB CONCLAVE FEEDBACK

FEEDBACK SURVEY FOR 3RD NATIONAL LABORATORY CONCLAVE ;28-29 OCT 2014;PUNE

Please use the following scale to respond to each of the conclave question 5=Excellent 4=good 3=average 2=bad 1=Very poor

Pre -Arrival

1. How was the Advertising/online information regarding the Conclave .

2. Advance information about the conference was .

Please use the following scale to respond to each of the conclave question 5=Excellent 4=good 3=average 2=bad 1=very poor

Arrival

3. How was the Conclave's Registration procedure

4. Information imparted by registration materials were-

5. Rate the materials provided at the conference (program booklets,folders, meeting bags, etc.).

Please use the following scale to respond to each of the conclave question 5=Excellent 4=good 3=average 2=bad 1=very poor

Conclave Location/ Facility

6. Pune as a Venue for conclave

7. Facility and Food .

Please use the following scale to respond to each of the conclave question 5=Excellent 4=good 3=average 2=bad 1=Very poor

Technical Sessions

8. The informative content of the sessions was

9. The question and answer period following the presentations was

10. New information and insight

11. Time alloted to each session

12. The sessions’ information fit the conference’s main theme- “CHALLENGES IN MANAGING LABORATORIES; DELIVERING COMPETENT SERVICES”

	Neutral	Satisfied	Very Satisfied	Unsatisfied
Overall

Please use the following scale to respond to each of the conclave question 5=Excellent 4=good 3=average 2=bad 1=very poor

Overall rating for the Conclave

13.How would you rate the relevance of the conclave and the covered topics for your work

14. Was the cost with respect to the experience worth it.

15.What were the most meaningful sessions of the conclave?

16. What suggestions do you have for improving the conclave ?

17. Would you attend a future Lab Conclave and recommend to others ?

Your evaluation, your ideas and your voice are important. Thank you for taking time to complete this assessment of the conclave.