This free survey is powered by QUESTIONPRO.COM
0%
 

SDA Board,

The President’s mid year evaluation is being conducted online and we are looking for your participation in this important process. We are asking for this to be completed no later than June 30, 2010.

The following statement is a mid year recap from Dr. Sankel:

I spend as much time as possible managing SDA’s day to day physician issues. Like yourselves, I’m in the OR almost every day so I do my best to share and publicize group information as time allows.

January and February were spent dealing with the ramifications of the lawsuit. This still continues but at least now I’m only awake a couple nights per week rather than every night. I tried to be as open and clear on this issue as possible and continue to be. I’ve already pushed the envelope regarding attorney-client privilege to be open with information.

The Board and I have tried to increase ‘transparency’. Frankly there is nothing really hidden. Since the beginning of the year, I’ve tried to increase the opportunity and frequency for comments, input and involvement in the larger issues affecting SDA. Even I’m surprised that things change slowly but I assure you they do move forward. We’ve avoided bad or reflex decisions. SDA has avoided becoming paralyzed by inaction.

We have implemented the Cash Balance Plan. Comments and feedback from physicians resulted in some modification from the original concept. In the end, over 2/3 of the physicians elected for contributions above the minimum level.

This year there has been a paradigm shift in how SDA views its relationship with the surgeons with whom we work. Surgeon preferences remain very important. However if there is a conflict with an SDA physician we are exploring and investigating this to a greater degree. The current plan is to try to re-approach the surgeon in six to twelve months and try to repair the damaged working relationship. More than one SDA physician will investigate complaints.

Last summer the Board approved hiring 1-2 physicians for August 2010. This immediately became two. By Fall we increased the number to 3. This winter we decided to hire a fourth new physician. In 2010 we increased the work days of Dr. Wassill. We hired Dr. Bailliet two days per week. We’re hiring two additional physicians to start this fall. So far, we’ve had attrition of one physician. On certain days manpower remains tight. The four new physicians should help.

Another paradigm shift this year is that SDA is occasionally asking our facilities and surgeons, radiologists, gastroenterologists with whom we work to be flexible with some case start times. Greater independence, especially at Skyridge, has been emphasized to manipulate the schedule to allow for better use of manpower. In a generalized sort of way, we are prioritizing the surgeons and surgical locations. SDA is trying to work smarter and not just harder. So far this plan is working and SDA has not seen negative results, at least not yet. If a problem occurs we will continuously modify this plan.

This year we are trying to move away from being the nighttime and weekend default for surgeons who typically do not use SDA during weekdays. A handful of surgeons have been notified. To date, all have been reasonable and understand this to be a natural business decision on our behalf. Granted, the understanding only occurred after I spoke to each surgeon.

The office based surgery, is attractive because of its $90-100/unit payer mix. The Medicare GI cases are being moved to better fit our availability. At Parker, we remain focused on trying to work with the surgeons who have the better paying patients.

During the first half of this year, SDA renegotiated the Anthem, United and Aetna contracts. These represent our three biggest commercial payers. We were able to obtain between 0 – 3% increases to our 2009 rates. I don’t foresee significant increases next year.

Several operational documents important to SDA were significantly outdated. So far this year the employment agreement and stock purchase plan have been addressed. I believe we have much more current documents now.

Relationships with our core facilities remain strong. Neither I nor the Board can take credit for that. It is certainly due to the strength and commitment of all the SDA physicians.

Prediction for next six months: I’m not going to sugar coat it, I think we’ll be pretty busy especially throughout the summer. We’ll likely be busy throughout the fall as well. As a corporation we remain solid. We will probably not expand much further. We will place even more emphasis on shoring up service within our core facilities. With an increase in manpower, we will be better able to adhere to our regionalization concept.

Jordan H. Sankel, MD
 
 
 
Please keep in mind these instructions when filling out this evaluation:

1. The process is similar to prior President evaluations where the Board (40% weight), Management Team (20% weight) and all non-Board SDA physicians (40% weight) are asked to participate in this process.

2. The eligible bonus compensation to the President is 10% of the prior years average shareholder W2 income.

3. Based on the tabulated score, payout is made ½ at mid-year (2nd quarter reconciliation) and ½ at year end (4th quarter reconciliation). A year end evaluation will determine the score and payout value at that time.

4. Any scores on the evaluation of “Needs Improvement” or below must be accompanied by comments in order to count in the evaluation score.

5. The evaluation is anonymous, but realize the survey software does track the number of responses from each participant so that only one score per individual is counted. Individual scores will not be tracked back to physicians nor be shared with the President. A final summary of the calculated scores and comments will be reviewed by the Board to determine if a bonus payment is due.

6. If you feel there is no suitable answer for a particular question, please leave that question blank. This will serve as a “not applicable” answer and won’t be counted in the totals.


Thank you for your interest and participation!
 
 
Goals and Objectives: (40%)
Unacceptable Needs Improvement Satisfactory Above Average Outstanding
1. To actively pursue any new business opportunities which are in alignment with our strategic goals.
2. To continue to maintain effective relationships with all of our facilities.
3. To continue to work with our hospital section chiefs to focus our time on maintaining existing relations as well as pursuing attractive new business relationships.
4. To provide effective leadership to help raise the level of accountability throughout SDA.
5. To ensure the Board and Management Team make every effort to improve transparency throughout SDA.
 
 
* Please explain the rating of Needs Improvement or below regarding the Goals and Objectives section:
   
 
 
Please enter any comments regarding the Goals and Objectives section:
   
 
 
Leadership: (20%) - Board
Unacceptable Needs Improvement Satisfactory Above Average Outstanding
1. Demonstrates ability to motivate Board Members, physicians, and management.
2. Demonstrates effectiveness in developing leaders within the group.
3. Demonstrates effectiveness in working with all of the physicians within the group.
4. Effectively runs Board meetings.
5. Demonstrates the ability to improve accountability within SDA.
6. Effectively provides input to SDA's committees.
 
 
* Please explain the rating of Needs Improvement or below regarding the Leadership section:
   
 
 
Please enter any comments regarding the Leadership section:
   
 
 
Managerial Effectiveness: (10%)
Unacceptable Needs Improvement Satisfactory Above Average Outstanding
1. The President is a competent and effective manager of the organization.
2. Effectively communicates board issues to non-board physicians.
3. Responsiveness to problems.
4. Demonstrates ability to resolve complex issues.
5. Recognizes and utilizes unique skills of individuals.
6. Supportive of SDA physicians and concerns of the group.
 
 
* Please explain the rating of Needs Improvement or below regarding the Managerial Effectiveness section:
   
 
 
Please enter any comments regarding the Managerial Effectiveness section:
   
 
 
Organizational Commitment: (10%)
Unacceptable Needs Improvement Satisfactory Above Average Outstanding
1. Effectively supports organizational strategic priorities.
2. Effectively supports changes as they occur.
3. Communicates in a positive and supportive manner.
 
 
* Please explain the rating of Needs Improvement or below regarding the Organizational Commitment section:
   
 
 
Please enter any comments regarding the Organizational Commitment section:
   
 
 
Job Knowledge: (10%)
Unacceptable Needs Improvement Satisfactory Above Average Outstanding
1. Possesses knowledge of SDA that enables effective decision making.
2. Demonstrates ability to resolve complex issues.
 
 
* Please explain the rating of Needs Improvement or below regarding the Job Knowledge section:
   
 
 
Please enter any comments regarding the Job Knowledge section:
   
 
 
External Relationships: (10%)
Unacceptable Needs Improvement Satisfactory Above Average Outstanding
1. Effectively expresses SDA's position on issues.
2. Willingness to support changes.
3. Fairness in dealings, even in difficult situations.
4. Displays a high level of professionalism.
5. Follows through on commitments.
 
 
* Please explain the rating of Needs Improvement or below regarding the External Relationships section:
   
 
 
Please enter any comments regarding the External Relationships section:
   
 
 
 
Please insert any comments you have on the President's ability to meet your expectations individually and as a group.
   
 
Please contact Michael if you have any questions regarding this survey.
Survey Software Powered by QuestionPro Survey Software